Dozens of leading civil society organizations, corporations, experts and academics released an open letter to Innovation, Science and Industry Minister François-Philippe Champagne, calling for the Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) to be withdrawn and given a full public consultation. AIDA is currently bundled into the government’s proposed privacy legislation, Bill C-27, resulting in what the letter describes as a “hasty, confusing, and rushed” study by the House of Commons Industry and Technology Committee, and a “fundamentally flawed bill which lacks democratic legitimacy.”
The open letter sharply criticizes the government’s introduction of AIDA without the open public consultation process warranted for such highly impactful legislation. Stakeholders were not given any opportunity to hear what the government had in mind and to lay out their concerns and hopes for AI legislation before it was introduced. Furthermore, the government promised a major rewrite of much of AIDA on the first day of committee consideration, catching off guard both stakeholders who were attempting to participate, and committee MPs themselves. Some stakeholders were forced to rework and resubmit their input in response to the revised proposal, while others denied a formal feedback window raised fundamental unanswered questions about AIDA’s current design and objectives.
The letter echoes concerns expressed to the Minister in September and December, and is endorsed by signatories who reflect a diverse range of civil society groups, think tanks, and businesses and ask the government to:
- Withdraw AIDA from Bill C-27 and initiate comprehensive and broad-based public consultation, with ample time for submissions from various stakeholders and incorporation of their feedback;
- Reintroduce a revised and improved AIDA that addresses the concerns raised from the start.
Some signatories of today’s letter also endorsed a March 2024 package of bare minimum recommended changes to AIDA, in the event that the government insists on pushing forward with the current bill.
Today’s letter follows on the government’s budget announcement of a $5.1 million fund for the new AI and Data Commissioner proposed in AIDA — an amount that is 1/8th of what the Office of the Privacy Commissioner receives. The proposed funding for the AI Commissioner also pales in comparison to the $2 billion the government has budgeted toward stimulating the AI industry, reflecting the government’s unbalanced priorities for AI.
In the past two years, more than 20,000 signatures and letters were sent to government officials calling for effective legislation to address the impacts of AI and facial recognition. Since November 2021, more than 34,000 signatures have been collected by OpenMedia petitions calling for new privacy laws in Canada, and more than 17,800 messages have been sent to the government calling for enhanced personal privacy protections.
The Joint Letter has been signed by:
Organizations:
- Amnesty International Canadian Section (English-speaking)
- BC Civil Liberties Association
- Canadian Arab Federation
- Canadian Civil Liberties Association
- Canadian Muslim Public Affairs Council
- Center for Digital Rights
- Center for Free Expression
- Communications Program, Glendon College, York University
- Digital Public
- National Federation of Teachers of Quebec (FNEEQ-CSN)
- Firearms Institute for Rational Education
- International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group
- InterPares
- Just Peace Advocates/Mouvement Pour Une Paix Just
- League of Rights and Freedoms
- Macdonald-Laurier Institute
- Mines Action Canada
- National Union of Public and General Employees (NUPGE)
- NSTP Consulting Corp.
- OpenMedia
- Privacy & Access Council of Canada
- Public Interest Advocacy Center
- Response Marketing Association
- Rideau Institute on International Affairs
- Tech Reset Canada
Individuals:
- Alessandra Renzi, Associate Professor, Concordia University
- Alexandra Flynn, Associate Professor, UBC
- Andrew Clement, Professor emeritus, University of Toronto
- Azeezah Kanji, legal academic and journalist
- Bianca Wylie, writer and public technology advocate
- Dr. Blayne Haggart, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Brock University
- Dr. Brenda McPhail, Public Policy Program, McMaster University
- Christelle Tessono, Technology Policy Researcher University of Toronto
- Dr. Colin Bennett, University of Victoria
- Daniel Konikoff, University of Toronto
- Evan Light, Associate Professor, York University
- Fenwick McKelvey, Associate Professor, Concordia University
- Jane Bailey, Professor, University of Ottawa Faculty of Law
- Joanna Redden, Associate Professor, Western University
- Jonathan Obar, Associate Professor, York University
- Jonathan Roberge, full professor, INRS
- Dr. Kate Milberry
- Dr. Kate Tillecczek, York University
- Dr. Kristen Thomasen, Assistant Professor, UBC
- Leslie Shade, Faculty of Information, University of Toronto
- Luke Stark, Assistant Professor, Western University
- Mariette Pilon, lawyer, member of the Quebec Bar
- Dr. Mary Ott, Assistant Professor, York University
- Matt Malone, Assistant Professor, Thompson Rivers University
- Natasha Tusikov, Associate Professor, Department of Social Science, York University
- Nicole St-Pierre, President, NSTP Consulting Corp.
- Nkechi E. Agugoesi, Internationally Trained Lawyer
- Ori Freiman, Digital Society Lab at McMaster University
- Sara M. Grimes, Professor, University of Toronto
- Dr. Sava Saheli Singh, York University
- Sharon Polsky MAPP, President of the Privacy and Access Council of Canada
- Spencer Izen, Researcher, BC Freedom of Information and Privacy Association
- Sun-ha Hong, Assistant Professor, Simon Fraser University
- Tamir Israel, Technology & Human Rights Lawyer
