• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • About
    • Leadership
    • Code of Ethics
    • Privacy Commitment
    • PACC Fellows
    • Speaking Invitations & Media Requests
  • Get Involved
    • Join the PACC
      • Advancing the Profession
      • Member Benefits
      • Why Join the PACC
        • Sponsors and Partners
      • Member Contact Update
    • Subscribe
    • Donate
      • Donor Bill of Rights
    • Speak Out
    • Volunteer
  • Certification
    • Guiding the Profession
    • Why Pursue Certification?
    • Benefits of Certification
    • Certificate or Certification?
    • Recertification
    • Certification FAQ
    • Accreditation
  • Careers
    • Current Opportunities
  • Resources
    • Strategic Privacy and Access Resource Center
      • Parents & Teachers
      • Standards
      • International Data Flows
      • SPARC Contribution Guidelines
      • Commissioners & Legislation
    • Reports
    • Recommended Reading
    • Media
    • Reports
  • News & Views
  • Training
    • Events Calendar
    • Privacy & Data Governance Congress 2026
    • Congress 2025 Presentation Resources
    • Past Events
    • Professional Development
    • Suggest a Speaker
  • Bill C-2
  • Login

Privacy and Access Council of Canada

The voice for privacy and access

Personal Digital Devices at the Border

02/May/2022

A great deal of consternation and confusion recently arose thanks to the language in a new piece of legislation introduced in the Senate on 29 March 2022.

Bill S-7, which amends s. 99(1)(a) of the Customs Act, is intended to remedy a deficiency in that legislation which, until now, has had no specific criteria for searching personal digital devices. 

Indeed, the Customs Act does not mention the word “digital”, and neither Bill S-7 nor the Customs Act defines “personal digital device”.

The new law will allow Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) border guards to “examine documents, including emails, text messages, receipts, photographs or videos, that are stored on a personal digital device that has been imported or is about to be exported and is in the custody or possession of a person if the officer has a reasonable general concern that:

(a)  this Act or a regulation made under it has been or might be contravened in respect of one or more of the documents;

(b)  any other Act of Parliament that prohibits, controls or regulates the importation or exportation of goods and is administered or enforced by the officer or any regulation made under that Act has been or might be contravened in respect of one or more of the documents; or

(c)  one or more of the documents may afford evidence in respect of a contravention under

        (i) this Act or a regulation made under it, or
        (ii) any other Act of Parliament that prohibits, controls or regulates the importation or exportation of goods and is administered or enforced by the officer or any regulation made under that Act.

What is meant by a “reasonable general concern” is anyone’s guess. The term is undefined and unknown. Indeed, a search of the entire Canada.ca website for that term results in only two entries: Bill S-7 and the CBSA notice that it is “developing regulations to prescribe legally-binding controls on the examination of documents stored on personal digital devices (PDD).”

Bill S-7 also allows for the seizure of devices, and for making “an electronic copy of a record or document if it is impossible or impractical to seize anything on which the record or document is stored or if seizing the thing is likely to degrade the record or document or make it unusable as evidence.” Seizing and examining the ‘conveyance’ — “vehicle, aircraft or water-borne craft or any other contrivance that is used to move persons or goods” — is a provision that has long been part of the Customs Act.

Allowing examination of the entire contents of a cellphone, laptop, or tablet because the border guard has a “reasonable general concern” is vague and subject to interpretation by the officer.

Anyone who “hinders” an officer in the commission of their duties is punishable on summary conviction and is liable to a fine of up to $10,000 or imprisonment for up to six months, or both; or is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a fine of up to $50,000 or to prison for up to five years, or to both. 

153.1 No person shall, physically or otherwise, do or attempt to do any of the following:
          (a) interfere with or molest an officer doing anything that the officer is authorized to do under this Act; or
          (b) hinder or prevent an officer from doing anything that the officer is authorized to do under this Act.

US-bound travelers should keep in mind that the law specifically grants authority to preclearance officers — the American Customs and Border Patrol agents who work at preclearance centers across Canada under authority of the Preclearance Act — with the power to “power to examine, search and detain documents… [and] to detain the personal digital device on which they are stored.” 

The authority granted to Canadian and American border guards does not apply to personal digital devices that are imported or exported solely for sale; for an industrial, occupational, commercial, institutional or other similar use; or for any other prescribed use. In other words, it appears to apply only to devices in the possession of individuals — including elected representatives from all levels of government — and which are intended to be retained by them for personal use. 

Filed Under: Government, Legislation, Privacy, Surveillance, Technology Tagged With: cross border, Legislation, Privacy

Footer

PACC is THE voice for privacy and access.

PACC is Independent  •  Non-profit  •  Non-partisan  •  Non-government

PACC is dedicated to the development and promotion of the access-to-information, information privacy, and data governance profession across the private, non-profit and public sectors.

PACC is the certifying body for access and privacy professionals, and engages in outreach efforts to advance awareness about access, privacy, and data protection.

None of the content herein may be used or reproduced in any manner for the purpose of training AI technologies or systems.

Recent Posts

  • Setting the Standard for Privacy Expertise in Canada
  • Data Governance Standard up for review and comment
  • Combination of legislative bills strips away Canadians’ rights
  • Global Comparative Testing of Responses to FOI Requests
  • PACC Joins the Call to Withdraw Bill C-2
  • Transparency Performance Indicators

ABOUT

MEMBERSHIP

CERTIFICATION

CAREERS

RESOURCES

BLOG

CONTACT

PRIVACY

 

Thanks to QuestionPro’s wide range of free survey templates designed by industry experts. We now know exactly where to improve
…………

© 2025 · Privacy and Access Council of Canada · Maintained by SLIcore Design.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.