• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • About
    • Leadership
    • Code of Ethics
    • Privacy Commitment
    • PACC Fellows
    • Speaking Invitations & Media Requests
  • Get Involved
    • Join the PACC
      • Advancing the Profession
      • Member Benefits
      • Why Join the PACC
        • Sponsors and Partners
      • Member Contact Update
    • Subscribe
    • Donate
      • Donor Bill of Rights
    • Speak Out
    • Volunteer
  • Certification
    • Guiding the Profession
    • Why Pursue Certification?
    • Benefits of Certification
    • Certificate or Certification?
    • Recertification
    • Certification FAQ
    • Accreditation
  • Careers
    • Current Opportunities
  • Resources
    • Strategic Privacy and Access Resource Center
      • Parents & Teachers
      • Standards
      • International Data Flows
      • SPARC Contribution Guidelines
      • Commissioners & Legislation
    • Reports
    • Recommended Reading
    • Media
    • Reports
  • News & Views
  • Training
    • Events Calendar
    • Privacy & Data Governance Congress 2026
    • Congress 2025 Presentation Resources
    • Past Events
    • Professional Development
    • Suggest a Speaker
  • Bill C-2
  • Login

Privacy and Access Council of Canada

The voice for privacy and access

Proposed or predetermined approach to address harmful content online

30/Sep/2021

Within hours of Elections Canada confirming the results of the 44th general federal election, the Government of Canada revealed that, of more than 100 platform promises, ten will receive special attention. Among them are three new laws that would require “web giants” to examine and analyze all web content and ensure Canadians cannot see hurtful online content deemed to “undermine Canada’s social cohesion or democracy,” and content that “might” undermine the credibility of the government, federal institutions, or the public service (i.e., employees of the federal government).

First introduced in the dying days of the last Parliamentary session, the vague language in the proposed laws casts a very wide net that includes the remarks made by political rivals, constituents, domestic and foreign journalists, academics and anyone else who might question, contradict, criticize or poke fun at government decisions, actions, or employees.

Various aspects of the proposed legislation have been criticized by many credible, knowledgeable and thoughtful experts including former Information and Privacy Commissioner Dr Ann Cavoukian, a former commissioner of the CRTC, the regulatory body that oversees compliance with the Broadcasting Act (“a full-blown assault on freedom of expression and the foundations of democracy”), Senator Pamela Wallin (“full-on assault on free speech in a democracy”), and law professors Michael Geist and Emily Laidlaw. Civil libertarians have described it as a “censorship bill so sweeping it would ban satire or jokes, impact news gathering and blacklist free speech on social and political issues.”

Although the proposals died with the dissolution of Parliament to make way for the 2021 federal election, work continued to pave the way for a new regulatory framework “that would create rules for how social media platforms and other online services must address harmful content”.

In anticipation of that new regime, the Department of Heritage invited “stakeholders and Canadians” to start submitting comments on July 29, 2021, about its “proposed approach to make social media platforms and other online communications services more accountable and more transparent when it comes to combating harmful content online.”

The very same consultation states what the “The framework sets out” — in the present tense — indicating that the consultation might be an exercise in futility for stakeholders and Canadians alike.

Given that the new government has assured the trio of internet regulations will be a reality within the first 100 days of a new cabinet being sworn in, “stakeholders and Canadians” have a brief window within which to contact Senators, Parliamentarians, and their elected representatives to express their views.

Filed Under: Democracy, Government, Legislation, Privacy, Surveillance, Technology

Footer

PACC is THE voice for privacy and access.

PACC is Independent  •  Non-profit  •  Non-partisan  •  Non-government

PACC is dedicated to the development and promotion of the access-to-information, information privacy, and data governance profession across the private, non-profit and public sectors.

PACC is the certifying body for access and privacy professionals, and engages in outreach efforts to advance awareness about access, privacy, and data protection.

None of the content herein may be used or reproduced in any manner for the purpose of training AI technologies or systems.

Recent Posts

  • PACC Joins the Call to Withdraw Bill C-2
  • Transparency Performance Indicators
  • Canada’s Children’s Privacy Code
  • International Day for Universal Access to Information 2025
  • Boundless boundaries of the Strong Borders Act
  • Making children the centre of privacy protections

ABOUT

MEMBERSHIP

CERTIFICATION

CAREERS

RESOURCES

BLOG

CONTACT

PRIVACY

 

Thanks to QuestionPro’s wide range of free survey templates designed by industry experts. We now know exactly where to improve
…………

© 2025 · Privacy and Access Council of Canada · Maintained by SLIcore Design.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.